It has to be the fear of having all their sites delisted since of duplicate content if there's one thing that frightens a web marketer more than anything else. But what if I said you had a better opportunity of being 'eaten by a shark' then you would of being picked up for breaking this regulation set out by Google and the other online search engine!
Expelling The Myth Once And For All
I have not satisfied a single marketer who utilizes PLR material that has been captured breaching the duplicate content rule. It means that whatever you've been informed about the connection between PLR material and the duplicate material guideline is for desire of another word entirely 'fake'.
All of us understand that when you buy PLR content, the possibilities are you're going to need to share it with a specific variety of online marketers. This in affect has actually been a significant deterrent from acquiring such content, despite the fact that the real truth is, it's entirely safe.
What Is The Duplicate Content Rule?
The duplicate content guideline impacts those who copy a site, word for word, in addition to imitating the exact style and design of the other site in concern. Well of course they're going to delist you if you do this! You may as well download somebody else's site and re-upload it to your own server under a different domain!
Using PLR content however on a totally unique looking website, will not offend the online search engine at all and why should it? Sure you might have some material on your website that is the exact same somewhere else, but you may also have some other special material that will benefit the visitors to your site.
Rewriting PLR Content
I wager I know what you're thinking. Your thinking "why has this man been telling us this entire time that PLR material is completely safe and now he's going to discuss rewording!" Well the fact is there are more advantages to using distinct material then there is for utilizing just straight copied PLR content.
Would the search engines be more most likely to rank a page with distinct material rather then a page that has the very same material discovered elsewhere? Well when we say rewrite that only suggests rewriting a fraction of the PLR content you have available. This guarantees your pages are going to be looked at by the search engines as being special content, which will more than most likely increase their rankings up greater than those posts copied word for word.
When in the past has a site been delisted directly as a result of using PLR content? I haven't satisfied a single online marketer who utilizes PLR material that has actually been caught breaching the duplicate material rule. It implies that whatever you've been informed about the connection between PLR content and the duplicate content guideline is for desire of another word entirely 'phony'.
Well the truth is there are more advantages to using special material then there is for using simply directly copied PLR material.
Would the search engines be more most likely to rank a page with distinct content rather than a page that has the very same content discovered somewhere else? What matters the most is that you never directly steal content that doesn't fall under private label rights, use PLR products that are of high-quality, and ideally make additional high-quality edits before you post.